Thank you again to the judging team, our supportive volunteers, and all the SMCI members who submitted their publications! I appreciate all your contributions to this year’s awards.
The 48 publications submitted this year clearly demonstrate that SMCI affiliates and fellows are committed to be the best at getting better! The 4 winning manuscripts tackle challenging problems with creativity to improve care locally as well as make substantial contributions to the literature.
To pique your interest, here are the highlights I gleaned from these 4 great publications:

Best Publication focused on the Adult Population: Manali I. Patel, et al. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. [Link]
Authors: Manali I. Patel, MD, MPH, MS; Kristopher Kapphahn, MS; Marilyn Dewland, RN; Veronica Aguilar, BA; Blanca Sanchez, BA; Etsegenet Sisay, BA; Ariana Murillo, BA; Kim Smith, MBA; David J. Park, MD

This study evaluated the effect of a community health worker (CHW)-led advance care planning (ACP) and symptom screening on utilization of acute, supportive, and end-of-life care; ACP documentation; patient- reported outcomes; and survival compared to usual care for patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage or recurrent solid and hematologic cancers.
Compared to patients receiving usual care, patients in the CHW intervention used less acute care during the 6 months post-enrollment and had more documentation (i.e., goals of care, advance directives, and Physician orders of Life Sustaining Treatment), utilization of palliative and hospice care, and improved mental and emotional health status.
This study suggests that CHW-led ACP conversations and symptom screening have many benefits for patients with advanced cancer and closes a gap left by previous interventions that did not include both ACP conversations or screening.

Best Publication focused on a Pediatric Population: Marie E. Wang, et al. Improving Efficiency on a Pediatric Hospital Medicine Service With Schedule-Based Family-Centered Rounds. [Link]
Authors: Marie Wang, MD, MPH; Amit Singh, MD, R. Marissa Hutauruk, RN; Jenina Chang, RN, MSN, Shanna Perales, MPA, Joseph Kim, MD

Using a quality improvement process, an implementation team integrated the evidence-based practice of family-centered, multi-disciplinary scheduled rounds with established start/end times format, defined team member roles, and created an EHR-linked scheduling tool.
The multi-disciplinary implementation team used the Model for Improvement to identify key barriers and build consensus by surveying attending physicians, residents, and nurses; the intervention was designed to address the identified key barriers.
The intervention has improved timeliness and nurse involvement in rounds and has been sustained for over 3 years with ongoing improvements being made to family notifications and education.

Best Publication focused on an Healthcare Workers: Karleen F. Giannitrapani, et al. Promising Strategies to Support COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel: Qualitative Insights from the VHA National Implementation. [Link]
Authors: Karleen F. Giannitrapani, PhD, MPH, MA; Cati Brown-Johnson, PhD; Natalie B. Connell; Elizabeth M. Yano, PhD, MSPH; Sara J. Singer, PhD, MBA; Susan N. Giannitrapani, MSN, APRN, CCRN; Wendy Thanassi, MD, MA; Karl A. Lorenz, MD, MSHS

Key informant interviews were conducted with employee occupational health providers to identify barriers and facilitators to the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) COVID-19 vaccination program for healthcare workers.
Results are summarizable and could inform implementation of other healthcare services; identified themes included leveraging interdisciplinary teams, aligning processes and resources, prioritizing trustworthy communication, facilitating shared learnings, and strategically preparing for the “tsunami” of early adopters and the “slow trickle” of later adopters.
To increase buy-in, healthcare providers need adequate time for conversations that address individual concerns, feature shared decision making, respect beliefs and identities, and recognize both parties’ shared identity as healthcare providers.

Best Publication Authored by a Trainee: Caroline Park (Fellow, Stanford Geriatrics), et al. Association Between Implementation of a Geriatric Trauma Clinical Pathway and Changes in Rates of Delirium in Older Adults With Traumatic Injury. [Link]
Authors: Caroline Park, MD, PhD; Ankur Bharija, MD; Matthew Mesias, MD; Ann Mitchell, RN, MSN, CNS, PHN; Purnima Krishna, MSN, MBA, RN; Nannette Storr-Street, RN, MS, AG-CNS-BC; Alyssa Brown, MS, OTR/L; Marina Martin, MD, MPH; Amy C. Lu, MD, MPH; Kristan L. Staudenmayer, MD, MPH

The Stanford Geriatric Trauma Care Pathway, a novel clinical pathway based on best practices, was implemented by an extensive multidisciplinary team, including trauma, geriatric medicine, emergency department, critical care, nursing, physical and occupational therapy, speech and language pathology, case management, social work, pharmacy, nutrition, transitional care, quality, and the patient family advisory council.
This retrospective case-control study evaluated the pathway’s impact on delirium and hospital length of stay and extensive process measures identified by leadership; process measures included adequate pain control within 24 hours, time to first mobilization, and completion of and time to first goals of care discussion.
Improvement was seen in the process metrics related to goals of care conversations demonstrating implementation success, but the evaluation also identified specific and actionable next steps to support further improvements.